Creationist view radiometric dating

It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood.There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks.That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are.Furthermore, different types of plants discriminate differently.

Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.Familiar to us as the black substance in charred wood, as diamonds, and the graphite in “lead” pencils, carbon comes in several forms, or isotopes.One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms: carbon-14, or C ratio gets smaller.To derive ages from such measurements, unprovable assumptions have to be made such as: There is plenty of evidence that the radioisotope dating systems are not the infallible techniques many think, and that they are not measuring millions of years. For example, deeper rocks often tend to give older “ages.” Creationists agree that the deeper rocks are generally older, but not by millions of years.Geologist John Woodmorappe, in his devastating critique of radioactive dating,[8] points out that there are other large-scale trends in the rocks that have nothing to do with radioactive decay.

Search for creationist view radiometric dating:

creationist view radiometric dating-2creationist view radiometric dating-85

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “creationist view radiometric dating”